Archive note · corrected
Prediction-market probabilities: preserve the contract before reading the forecast
A dated correction separates public macro records from an unregistered prediction-market contract, call cohort and allocation study. Unsupported probabilities, returns and thresholds are withdrawn.
What changed in this article
Editorial correction · 9 September 2026. The original article was published on 22 February 2026 and said that Kalshi pricing implied a greater-than-50% chance of a 2026 U.S. stock-market correction. It also presented N=336 influencer calls, a 4.6 percentage-point risk-adjusted comparison, an S&P 500 level, a N=19 midterm-year panel and defensive sleeve percentages. The page did not preserve the contract identifier, question, settlement rule, price/volume history, retrieval timestamp, call register, portfolio rows or calculations. Those probability, cohort, return, frequency and allocation claims are withdrawn. The original URL and publication date remain unchanged.
A prediction-market price is contract-specific and time-specific. It must not be paraphrased as a universal forecast or as a reason to change an allocation.
What the dated macro records establish
| Source date and record | Dated fact | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| 20 February 2026 · BEA GDP advance estimate for Q4 and 2025 | The advance estimate reported real GDP growth of 1.4% at an annual rate for 2025 Q4. The Q4 PCE price index increased 2.9% at an annual rate, and the measure excluding food and energy increased 2.7%. | These are original-vintage macro observations. The page did not supply a contemporaneous expectation snapshot that would support its “versus consensus” labels. |
| 20 February 2026 · BEA Personal Income and Outlays for December 2025 | The December PCE price index increased 0.4% from November and 2.9% from December 2024; excluding food and energy, the monthly increase was 0.4%. | This is a monthly release with a different frequency from quarterly SAAR GDP/PCE. It does not establish a prediction-market probability or portfolio result. |
| Kalshi markets | The original source list points to the public market platform. | No contract ID, resolution text, historical price/volume snapshot or settlement record was preserved for the claimed 2026 correction probability. |
The BEA releases can support a dated macro chronology. They do not validate a contract probability, influencer posture or defensive-portfolio advantage.
What is withdrawn
The greater-than-50% Kalshi reading, S&P 500 level, 336-call audit, 4.6pp risk-adjusted result, 19-year midterm panel, 13/19 frequency, median drawdown and time-to-trough figures, defensive/influencer sleeve ranges, and the proposed probability-triggered risk rule are not verified findings. No replacement probability, return comparison or allocation instruction is published.
The neutral research question—how market-implied odds and public positioning differ—remains possible only after the contract and portfolio registers are frozen. It is not answered by a dashboard link.
Minimum register for a future prediction-market comparison
Record the contract ticker and exact question; open/close and settlement timestamps; resolution source and rule; bid/ask or trade price, volume and retrieval time; timezone; call URL, author, timestamp and wording; index/instrument and portfolio definitions; benchmark, weights and rebalance rules; fees and slippage; and the complete calculation output. Store expectation and outcome data separately.
Original publication: 22 February 2026. Correction: 9 September 2026. AI-assisted source checking and writing; no independent human expert review. This page is educational market research, not personalized investment advice.